Connect with us

Men’s Health

Women live longer, but don’t have healthier lives | India News

Published

on

Women in India can, on average, live almost three years longer than men. But when it comes to living a healthy life, the difference almost disappears. This pattern of large gender differences in life expectancy but much smaller ones in healthy life expectancy is not unique to India. Public health experts say this global phenomenon could be due to poorer access to health care and attention to health, especially among older women.
According to the recently released 2021 World Health Statistics report, women around the world can live an average of five years longer than men, but when it comes to healthy life expectancy, that benefit shrinks to less than half at 2.4 years. The data also shows that the global average difference between life expectancy and healthy life expectancy is around nine years, which means that while life expectancy might be high, it has not been healthy for the past nine years.
Many health professionals have expressed concern that health and medical research has focused too much on extending life rather than living healthier lives by slowing aging to improve the quality of old age. This is most important in the 30 or so countries with a life expectancy of 80 years or more. They saw a small improvement in life expectancy over the 2012-19 period, but healthy life expectancy either stagnated or even declined.
However, in less developed countries that are still struggling to increase life expectancy, improvements in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy appear to be keeping pace. In fact, several countries have seen better improvements in healthy life expectancy than life expectancy.
In only two countries, Oman and Afghanistan, men have a longer life expectancy than women. But in about a dozen other countries, men have a higher healthy life expectancy than women. Most of them are also the ones with poor equality. Countries where the difference in healthy life expectancy between men and women is smallest include India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, several countries in sub-Saharan Africa and the countries of the Middle East.
“Women’s life expectancy is significantly higher than that of men, but this benefit does not translate into healthier lives for women. There are several reasons for this inequality, including women’s lack of access and decision-making about their health and physical autonomy. That Recently published Longitudinal The Aging Survey of India shows a high prevalence of reproductive health problems in older women beyond childbearing age. Older women also have a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and poor nutritional status compared to their male counterparts ” said Poonam Muttreja, Executive Director of the Population Foundation of India.
Interestingly, in some of the most developed countries with the highest life expectancy, such as Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland, the difference in healthy life expectancy between men and women is very small compared to the difference in life expectancy. This seems to be because they hit some kind of ceiling when it comes to healthy life expectancy, which seems to be anywhere from 71 to 72 years for both sexes.
Of the 30 countries at the top of the life expectancy table, Japan, Singapore and South Korea alone have healthy life expectancies over 73. Life expectancy is currently increasing faster than healthy life expectancy, so morbidity (average number of people in poor health) is slowly expanding, says Guy Brown from Cambridge University in his 2014 article entitled “Living too long” in Embo Reports. He called for a change in medical research funding from causes of death to causes of aging and age-related morbidity.
“We are working to narrow the gap between life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. Over time, we can certainly narrow this gap, although the pace of narrowing will be slower. “stated Dr. KS James, director of the International Institute of Population Sciences.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Men’s Health

Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson Explained Why He Doesn’t Have Six-Pack Abs

Published

on

Axelle / Bauer-GriffinGetty Images

Before we start, let’s agree on something: For someone who is nearly 50 years old, Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson is in incredible shape. As someone with a background in professional American football, wrestling and performing hardcore action scenes – with decades of strength training under the (weight) belt – DJ is a fitness icon for men half his age and has made a name for himself made by Hollywood’s strongest leading actors.

These physical skills are what power tens of thousands of frantic Google searches as those desperately looking for Johnson’s workouts try to find the plan that got him into such gigantic shape. But the internet has defied one mystery: Where are Johnson’s six pack abs? He’s got the core strength and low body fat required to make them pop, after all.

That was the question Johnson asked during a recent WIRED “Autocomplete” interview in which DJ answered some of the internet community’s most burning questions. The question read by his Jungle Cruise co-star, Emily Blunt, was, “What’s wrong with The Rock’s abs?”

“That sucks!” replied Johnson to the question that struck his body. “There’s nothing wrong with them, no. Here’s the thing. I think because on Instagram all these Instagram fitness models have these incredible six, eight, 12, 24 packs.”

This content is imported from Instagram. You may find the same content in a different format or more information on their website.

“I have a five and a half pack, sometimes a four and a half pack,” he continued. “But the problem was – which a lot of people don’t know – I ripped the upper part of my thigh off my pelvis in a wrestling match and it popped, in a wrestling match.

“And then it started a chain reaction and tore my abdominal wall, so I had to do emergency surgery with a triple hernia, one tear, one tear, and one tear.” [pointing to each tear].

Sounds like a tough ride – one that will definitely ruin any unwarranted keyboard comment. “Those bastards who google what’s wrong with the abs on The Rock? ‘ Well, it’s called a 45 minute wrestling match and the top of my quad popped out of my pelvis and my adductor popped out of my pelvis, “said Johnson.

“And the pain I’ve been through … I have to fix this shit. I’ll google what got over The Rock?”

Very good reason, you will agree with me.


Ed Cooper is Assistant Digital Editor at Men’s Health UK, writing and editing on anything you want to know – from tech to fitness, mental health to style, food and more.

This content is created and maintained by a third party and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may find more information on this and similar content at piano.io

Continue Reading

Men’s Health

Why Winter is The Best Season for Bulking

Published

on

With the lack of beach days forcing you to put up with it all and minimal impromptu parties popping up on the calendar, there’s relatively no need to wear a chiseled six-pack year round. Therefore, winter is the best time of year to build as much lean muscle mass as possible. For those unfamiliar with the concept, it should be made clear that bulking doesn’t translate directly to bodybuilding (aka You Won’t Walk Away Like the Michelin Man).

How do i start?

The most important thing is that to build muscle you need to eat a lot more. The reverse formula for what it takes to lose weight, bulking, requires you to expend more energy than the body needs while at the same time giving some of that energy, e.g. Through regular and strenuous physical activity to build muscle mass.

The amount of food you need to eat varies from person to person and takes into account your current physique and fitness goals, which is why I recommend that you always seek advice from your doctor. For some, it might mean adding an extra can of yogurt to your morning cereal, others need to include a different meal each day, but you want your wellness journey to be tailored just for you.

Wait … am I not getting fat?

While it may be a cause for concern for some, fat gain is part of the mass building process. However, you don’t want to fall into the pattern of simply eating more for profit, it’s all about quality and informed food choices.

Start increasing your calories in small increments, prioritizing more full fat dairy, whole grains, and lean meats to underpin each meal. Other high-calorie foods that should appear on your radar include avocado, sweet potato, and nuts.

Hot Tip: Swapping Vegemite for Peanut Butter on Toast will increase your energy and protein intake without increasing the bread amount, making you less likely to feel too full.

So am I doubling the protein requirement?

Contrary to popular belief, bulking requires more than just protein (so stop knocking down those shakes). The best sources of protein to include in your diet today should be: eggs, nuts and seeds, beans, legumes, lean meats, and seafood. Again, so many factors play a role in how much you need, including your gender, height, and exercise program.

If you are feeling fit and ready to reshape your body but are lacking inspiration in the kitchen department, I recommend investing in one of the many food delivery programs available across Austria that will support your fitness goals. Company like MACROS For example, provide plans called Sculpt, Perform, and Gain, all of which have been pre-portioned and dietitian-approved to suit your lifestyle. The best part? It ships right to your door, which means more time training and less effort preparing meals.

Forget everything you’ve heard about gobbling up whole pizzas, gallons of milk, and tons of cheeseburgers, bulking is far less scary than it sounds and can indeed be a welcome change from your usual fitness regimen.

Continue Reading

Men’s Health

Review finds women’s NCAA Tournament got less than men’s

Published

on

From the first practice session to the final four, the bells and whistles for this year’s NCAA women’s tournament lagged far behind those of the men’s tournament.

The inequalities were brought back to the fore on Tuesday in a damning review by Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, a law firm hired to review gender equality issues at NCAA championship events. Page by page, the review deals with the big and small differences. The women’s teams in San Antonio were getting less of several things – including amenities, transportation, and even food – than the men in Indianapolis last March.

From the beginning, when the organizers of the men’s tournament announced plans for an event with 68 teams in one central location due to the coronavirus last November, it took another month before the organizers of the women’s tournament were able to publish their plan.

At almost every step thereafter, the report said, the men’s tournament was in full swing with well-equipped weight rooms, spacious lounge areas in its hotels and tournament venues, while the organizers of the women’s tournament did not have similar resources.

“These gender inequalities were built into the structure of the tournaments and how the tournaments were viewed by the NCAA,” the report said.

The issues were publicized on social media, most notably by Oregon gamer Sedona Prince, whose first tweet on the subject has now been viewed more than 18 million times.

The company’s deep dive also revealed that the COVID-19 testing procedures were different on the two tournament bladders: men were given rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests daily, while women only had to do one PCR test per week along with daily antigen tests.

An athlete who participated in the review said the NCAA’s various testing protocols “really said about how they felt to us as humans, like we weren’t important enough to have good tests on (COVID-19) anything is life-threatening “.

The company’s report found that the inequality in tests did not put the health of people at either site at risk. “Nevertheless,” the report says, “antigen tests have a lower specificity than PCR tests and thus increase the likelihood of false positive or inconclusive results.”

The report found many other cases where women got less than men:

– Ways to escape from hotel life. The NCAA set up a park at a minor league ballpark in Indianapolis where teams could relax outside while women in San Antonio opened up opportunities through May 16.

– Meal. Men ate from a buffet layout in hotels, while women limited themselves to prepackaged meals until the inequality became known.

– Player gifts. The report found that the NCAA spent $ 125.55 per player on gifts and memorabilia distributed at the men’s tournament; it spent less than half ($ 60.42) on women in the first and second rounds.

The company found that the Texas women’s event had less signage and advertising than the Indianapolis men, and the March Madness brand was not used in women’s games. The NCAA later said the women’s tournament would use March Madness in the future.

Kaplan noted that the problems with the weight room and other inequalities between the two events were mainly due to a lack of staffing at the women’s tournament and coordination between the organizers of the two events.

“As these issues were exacerbated by the unique challenge of planning and conducting a championship amid a global pandemic,” the report said, “it became the world’s attention.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending