Connect with us

Health

‘Anomie in post-Covid world reason for more urban suicides’ | Nagpur News

Published

on

Dr. Abhishek Somani, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, invokes the concept of “anomie” by French sociologist Emile Durkheim to explain the state of despair and hopelessness that many face after rounds of limitations and Go through isolation. An increasing sense of dejection is a very strong indicator of suicidal intent, adds a widespread sense of fear about the unpredictability of the disease, economic problems due to lockdown, an increase in alcohol and other substance use, resulting health problems, and verbal and physical violence added home. All of these are an important mix in leading a person to suicidal intent. In an interview with TOI, Dr. Somani, who is also the past president of the Psychiatric Society of Nagpur, elaborates on this burning issue.
Excerpts …
Q. What are your general observations on the upward trend in suicides?
A. The social fabric is getting weaker. The earlier concepts of shared families and extended families are now seen in fewer and fewer cases. That important safety net is now missing. With the world at your fingertips with the Internet, a Pandora’s box has been opened. So you are not only influenced by what is good, but also by things that are not so good. The Blue Whale game is a good example. The internet also draws attention to the lack of sophistication in one’s life. And since everyone publishes photos of the best time ever, a doubt creeps in: “Why am I not as happy as you are? Maybe I’m a failure. People got through the pandemic without any significant increase in suicide gestures in the immediate period. But the stress of the pandemic and its social, economic and personal effects will increase mental health problems in the long run, and we will see an increase unless urgent action is taken to alleviate these problems.
Q. Has the lockdown and Covid phase increased suicidality?
A. Surprisingly not. There was an immediate period of escalation in anxiety and depression as the pandemic level began to decline, but the incidence of self-harm and committed suicide was lower than expected. We can speculate that maybe everyone was in trouble together, so people drew strength from misery.
Q. Why are middle class people and even the financially secure people at the end of their lives?
A. Overall, the suicide rate tends towards cities. Large cities account for nearly 25% of suicide deaths in urban areas, according to NCRB 2019 data. The same data suggests that over 90% of suicides are committed by people from the lower social classes, but common sense suggests that it can be disgusting to have suicides reported by those who are better at hiding a shameful death .
Q. How do you justify this underreporting claim?
A. The French sociologist Emile Durkheim’s concept of “anomie” comes to mind. Anomie is a state of society in which generally accepted values ​​and meanings lose their acceptance, but new values ​​(with common consensus) have yet to be developed. People at risk develop a sense of senselessness and emotional emptiness. This feeling of helplessness and hopelessness is a strong indicator of suicidal intent. Financial stability is by no means a protection against psychological stress. Peace of mind emerges from feeling satisfied with everything one has. So money doesn’t do much to prevent suicide, but it definitely helps to hide it. Anomie can develop in the post-covid world where normal interactions and communication have become a risky activity. So putting on a mask and maintaining physical distance are not a natural part of our behavior.
Q. Are you suggesting that the mask and physical distancing need to go at some point?
A. We cannot maintain physical distance for life. You can see that people don’t put on their masks. Few of those who are very cautious or paranoid about Covid still adhere to the norms. Quiet, everyone has left. This is a kind of anomie that happens when normal social rules are given up or broken but nothing else could be picked up. This created a “I don’t know what to do” feeling. The normal structure of life is disturbed and there is no alternative. The mind cannot exist in an ambivalence. This ambivalence causes fear and fear has suicide as one of the results. You have to take sides, yes or no. There is a lot of indecision due to Covid. You don’t know when the pandemic will end, who will survive if you get infected.
Q. Is the pandemic the only cause of mental health problems?
A. All of the previous factors related to suicide have been accelerated by the stress caused by Covid and Lockdown. 33% of suicides are due to family problems, 17% to illness, 6% to addiction and 10% to money problems. Each of these factors increased during the lockdown. Some families have grown closer, but domestic violence has increased dramatically as any police officer will tell you. Alcohol consumption has risen sharply. Covid’s hospital stay has severely impacted the family’s savings. So overall, the pandemic has accelerated the fire of the mental health problems that people will face over the next few years. An increase in mental disorders would increase the number of episodes of self harm, unless we can make people aware of the importance of seeking help in a timely manner.
Q. What are the early signs and indicators of mental illness?
A. A noticeable change in a person’s behavior over a period of typically 2 weeks or more. He / she becomes more moody, loses interest in ordinary activities, appears withdrawn or aloof, sloppy looking, suddenly crying or flying in anger, talking about how better it would be if he / she wasn’t around, etc. But it requires a really keen eye to see that we often give a long rope to those who have recently suffered a traumatic event. We consider this part of normal sadness. Conversations about dying are not. The number of violent and homicidal offenses is increasing significantly, which can also be seen in the context of the lockdown-associated anomie, in which social rules and values ​​lose importance.
Q What are the solutions?
A. Prevention is easier said than done. It will take years of effort to create mental health professionals capable of meeting India’s tremendous needs. There are currently fewer than 10,000 psychiatrists in India, the overwhelming majority of whom serve urban areas. In the meantime, a sustained campaign in the media to highlight symptoms of mental illness, support and recognition from well-known personalities and simple things like a break from ambition, changes in a more balanced lifestyle, and sustainable life goals will help.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinE-mail

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health

Open up about barriers rural residents face in getting help for mental health

Published

on

We’re tight-lipped in the farmland. To suffer in silence seems to be the way we have been taught. But I think we need to acknowledge and address our problems. October 10th was World Mental Health Day and gave me a nudge. It’s okay to admit that we’re not okay. Write it down on a health questionnaire. Tell your doctor. Be honest and give voice to your mental health, not just for yourself but for those who love you, who need you.

Mental health is important for everyone, whether in cities or in the country. Photo by Kallie Coates / Grand Vale Creative LLC

In the city or in the country, we are alike when it comes to mental suffering and stigma. The difference is that those of us in non-urban areas face three additional mental health challenges. According to the Rural Health Information Hub, these challenges include:

  • Accessibility: “Rural residents often travel long distances to use services, are less likely to have psychiatric insurance and are less likely to recognize an illness,” says RHIhub. Personally, I’m insured, but if I keep an appointment I’ll take two to four hours off from work to attend. There have been instances where I’ve taken a full day off to do a 200-mile round-trip for a counseling appointment. Not all rural residents can change this schedule. Telemedicine options have been expanded by the pandemic. I hope telemedicine continues to improve mental health accessibility.
  • Availability: I love rural clinics and support them with routine health care. However, at the moment I have no possibility of psychological support in a rural health clinic. According to RHIhub, “there is a chronic shortage of mental health professionals and mental health providers are more likely to practice in urban centers.” I called an expert I had seen years ago after a new appointment and was told they were six would book up to a year for new dates. At first, I had empathy for the person who had to answer the phone and make appointments. Next, I thought of those in the mental health services industry who are unable to get in touch with everyone who wants to see them. We need more experts. I still want to see this professionally and personally. I will wait for your appointment. I will also see another professional on video sooner.
  • Acceptance: The first time I wrote about mental health in this column, I received feedback from someone who felt they knew me enough in real life to comment and say I had the mental health issues or the reality Not really familiar with the effects of mental illness is a family disease. She was wrong. I usually don’t stick with the haters or negative feedback, but it did for a while. Then came a person who personally thanked them for talking about mental health. Don’t let this stop you from seeking professional mental health help. “The stigma of needing or receiving psychiatric care and the limited selection of trained professionals who work in rural areas create barriers to care,” says RHIhub. We can break down barriers by saying that it is okay to seek psychological help for you or your loved ones.

Be honest and give voice to your mental health, not just for yourself but for those who love you, who need you, says Katie Pinke.  Erin Brown / Grand Vale Creative

Be honest and give voice to your mental health, not just for yourself but for those who love you, who need you, says Katie Pinke. Erin Brown / Grand Vale Creative

We are all affected by mental health problems. Unless you have any mental health problems or severe mental illness, you know someone who is. Add in a global health pandemic and we’re more isolated now than we were two years ago. Don’t be silent about mental health or serious mental illness. When someone confides in you, help them get in touch with professional help. Listen more than talk. Showing up with your presence is a difference maker.

Newsletter subscription for email notifications

You are not alone. You are needed. You are loved. Your presence is a crucial part of someone’s community. I made a deliberate decision not to let the waves of fear swallow me up that I sometimes feel. I fight it with a network of support. I also know that a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, fresh air, quiet time in my beliefs, and a few things for myself that I enjoy have positive effects on my mental health.

Caring for our mental health is just as important as caring for our physical health. Let’s start by breaking down the rural mental health barriers of availability, accessibility, and acceptance by seeking the help we need regardless of the travel time, waiting time for appointments, or the stigma we need to overcome.

To read more of Katie Pinke’s The Pinke Post columns, click here.

Pinke is the editor and managing director of Agweek. You can reach her at kpinke@agweek.com or connect with her on Twitter @katpinke.

Continue Reading

Health

Facebook should modify algorithms to make social media safer for teens

Published

on

Talk to a pediatrician and we will tell you: We are going through a mental crisis in teenagers. The pandemic has brought school closings and stay-at-home restrictions that resulted in social isolation among youth. With more than 721,000 COVID-19 deaths across the country, many teens know a deceased person personally and in some cases have even lost a parent.

Unsurprisingly, pediatricians like us are at the forefront of caring for more than twice as many teenagers struggling with depression, anxiety, and eating disorders.

With this in mind, social media giant Facebook – owner of Instagram, a platform used by more than half of teenagers in the United States – plays a key role. Amid these rising and unprecedented rates of mental illness among teenagers, will Facebook be part of the problem or the solution?

Instagram and eating disorders

Whistleblower and former Facebook product manager Frances Haugen recently testified before Congress that internal research by the company showed that Instagram may have worsened the mental health of young people. In these studies, teenage girls reported feeling worse about their bodies on Instagram, increasing eating disorders, and having thoughts of suicide more often.

We’ve seen examples of this at our own eating disorders clinic, where teenagers often tell us Instagram exposes them to posts that perpetuate unrealistic body shapes and share harmful diet tips.

Facebook’s internal research confirms a 2018 study by the Pew Research Center that shows 1 in 4 teenagers say social media negatively affects their lives because they experience bullying and harassment, unrealistic views about their lives Develop colleagues and get distracted from spending too much time online.

Again, these are concerns we often hear from teenagers in our practice. Such issues are likely to be compounded among teenagers who spend more time on social media, which is particularly worrying given that nearly 90% of teenagers who visit Instagram and other platforms do so several times a day.

This time of immense control presents Facebook with a pivotal opportunity to support, rather than hurt, teenage mental health. Legislators have proposed stepping in and regulating the platform, and as pediatricians we are inclined to support these measures if they are aimed at improving the health and wellbeing of teenagers. However, despite regulation, social media is likely to play a permanent role in teenage lives for years to come. Facebook should seize this moment to take action to clearly improve and support teenage mental health.

Larry Strauss:A teacher’s question: Social media harms my students, but do technical executives even care?

Perhaps most importantly, Facebook and other social media companies should reinforce healthy messages. In the same study by the Pew Research Center, 1 in 3 teenagers reported that social media had a positive impact on their lives, most often because it helped them connect with others or find important information.

However, algorithms in Facebook and Instagram – which are kept secret from public scrutiny – are based on how many people like, share and comment. This approach encourages bombastic, misleading, and unhealthy posts.

We need health-oriented algorithms

Instead, social media companies could specifically curate and actively promote messages about health and wellbeing. Numerous pediatric influencers (e.g. @teenhealthdoc, specialist in youth health in New York) already offer evidence-based advice and health information for adolescents and their families on Instagram and other platforms. Facebook could set up an advisory board of clinicians to assess the quality of influencers’ posts, offer health care providers a review (with the invaluable “blue check mark” that shows a user is authentic and remarkable), and make their posts accessible to a youthful audience do.

Social media companies should also encourage young people to post accurate, health-promoting content themselves.

Tom Kistenmacher:Facebook Revelations: Social Media Strengthened Our Voices, But Impaired Our Hearing

This approach would require Facebook to change its algorithms, which the company is likely to resist unless regulation enforced. Social media companies have come under constant fire for being too late to respond to misleading or harmful posts, which contributes to bad press and negative regulatory attention.

We claim that Facebook should be proactive in its approach and promote high quality content that is interesting to teens. Done right – with an infusion of creativity, thoughtful design, and humor – positive, health-promoting posts can receive a tremendous number of likes, shares, and comments, but may need to be actively promoted amid the negative messages currently prevailing. Realizing that it has a duty to block misinformation about COVID-19, Facebook must take similar steps to protect teenagers’ mental health.

Facebook can also help facilitate moderation in the use of its platforms among teenagers. The current business models of social media companies are driven by the persistent, compulsive use of their products and the advertising revenue they generate. In his credit, Facebook has imposed advertising restrictions on teenagers.

The company should build on this by helping teenagers put their smartphones down. To reduce screen time, Apple introduced Screen Time, an iPhone and iPad integration that allows parents to limit the time teens spend using social media apps. However, workarounds are easy to find for teenagers. Facebook should introduce its own functionality that would allow parents to limit teenagers’ use of its platforms.

We will address the after-effects of COVIC-19 on teenage mental health in the years to come. The reality is that while many of us pediatricians would like to remove social media from the lives of our teenage patients altogether, Instagram and other popular platforms are going nowhere. Social media companies wield tremendous power over young people. You should use it to empower – not hinder – the hard work we frontline pediatricians do to fight mental illness.

Dr. Scott Hadland is the Chief Medical Officer of Adolescent Medicine at MassGeneral Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School (@DrScottHadland on Twitter and Instagram). Dr. Kathryn Brigham is the medical director of the Teenage Eating Disorders Program at MassGeneral Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School.

Continue Reading

Health

Study finds a downward trend in buprenorphine misuse among U.S. adults with opioid use disorder

Published

on

Data from a nationwide representative survey shows that in 2019, nearly three-quarters of US adults who used buprenorphine had not abused the drug in the past 12 months. In addition, buprenorphine abuse among people with opioid use disorder declined between 2015 and 2019, although the number of people receiving buprenorphine treatment increased. The study, published today on the JAMA Network Open, was conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Buprenorphine is an FDA-approved drug used to treat opioid use disorders and to relieve severe pain. Buprenorphine, used to treat opioid use disorders, works by partially activating opioid receptors in the brain, which can help reduce opioid cravings, withdrawal, and general use of other opioids.

In 2020, more than 93,000 people lost their lives to drug overdoses, with 75% of those deaths being caused by an opioid. In 2019, however, fewer than 18% of people with last year’s opioid use disorder were receiving medication to treat their addiction, in part because of stigma and barriers to accessing those medications. To prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorders, doctors must do so as part of a certified opioid treatment program or submit a letter of intent to the federal government, and the number of patients they can treat at the same time is limited. Only a small fraction of doctors are authorized to treat an opioid use disorder with buprenorphine, and even fewer prescribe the drug.

Quality medical practice requires the provision of safe and effective treatments for health conditions, including substance use disorders. This includes providing life-saving drugs to people with an opioid use disorder. This study provides further evidence of the need for expanded access to proven treatment approaches such as buprenorphine therapy, despite the remaining stigma and prejudice that persists in people with addiction and the drugs used to treat them. “

Nora D. Volkow, MD, NIDA director

In April 2021, the U.S. Department of Health released updated guidelines for buprenorphine practice to expand access to treatment for opioid use disorders. However, barriers to the use of this treatment persist, including doctor’s discomfort in treating patients with opioid use disorder, the lack of adequate insurance coverage, and concerns about the risks of distraction, abuse, and overdose. Abuse is defined as patients taking medication in a manner not recommended by one doctor and may include consuming someone else’s prescription medication or taking their own prescriptions in larger quantities, more frequent doses, or for a longer duration than directed.

To better understand buprenorphine use and abuse, researchers analyzed data on prescription opioid use and abuse, including buprenorphine, from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 2015-2019. The NSDUH is conducted annually by the Department of Substance Abuse and Mental Health. It provides representative data on prescription opioid use, abuse, opioid use disorder, and motivation for recent abuse in the civil, non-institutionalized US population nationwide.

The researchers found that nearly three-quarters of US adults who reported using buprenorphine in 2019 had not abused buprenorphine in the past 12 months. In total, an estimated 1.7 million people reported taking buprenorphine as prescribed in the past year, compared to 700,000 people who reported using the drug. In addition, the proportion of patients with opioid use disorder who have abused buprenorphine has tended to decline over the study period, although the number of patients who received buprenorphine treatment has increased recently.

Importantly, in adults with an opioid use disorder, the most common reasons for recent buprenorphine abuse were “because I am addicted to opioids” (27.3%), suggesting that people are using buprenorphine over the counter for self-treatment of cravings and withdrawal may have symptoms related to an opioid use disorder and “to relieve physical pain” (20.5%). In addition, adults who took buprenorphine were less likely to have buprenorphine abuse among those who received drug treatment than those who did not. Taken together, these results illustrate the urgent need to expand access to buprenorphine treatment, as receiving treatment can help reduce buprenorphine abuse. In addition, strategies need to be developed to further monitor and reduce buprenorphine abuse.

The study also found that people who did not receive drug treatment and those who lived in rural areas were more likely to abuse drugs. However, other factors, such as belonging to a racial / ethnic minority or living in poverty, did not influence buprenorphine abuse. The study authors suggested that addressing the current opioid crisis should improve both the access to and quality of buprenorphine treatment for people with opioid use disorder.

“Three-quarters of adults taking buprenorphine do not abuse the drug,” said Wilson Compton, MD, MPE, NIDA associate director and lead author on the study. “Many people with opioid use disorder need help, and as clinicians we need to treat their condition. Use disorder can access this life-saving drug.”

Source:

National Health Institute

Journal reference:

Han, B., et al. (2021) Trends and Characteristics of Buprenorphine Abuse Among Adults in the United States. JAMA network open. doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29409.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending